The Basement in the Attic

My random meanderings on lived experiences & the thoughts they generate.


Well, I guess it's inevitable. One of the bloggers I sort of “followed” has taken a hiatus. Sure, April, right. (www.fimoculous.com) A fellow Minnesotan, he's actually paid to do something with/to content, instead of me, I'm just paid to make sure it moves around. Wonder if I could get paid by the mile instead of the megabyte?! It's easier for me, I make no pretenses to anything like a schedule here: I come in for the caffeine, the yummy munchies, and Charlie's zeitgeist. Uh oh, I think I'm going to get a lecture on misusing that word...

But for others, the blogging is the thing. Remember Flash Mobs? I was signed up on CheeseBikini (one of the primo flash-mob listserv/blog) within 1 minute of hearing about it. Within months, it was gone. I mean it looked like last summer was going to be just the warm up. It was the swan song. So we're left behind thinking what did we do wrong? Where's our ? I think it might be the “open source” problem in a tight economy. When all the sources for your content are being paid to do ancillary jobs, then you benefit from their hobbies. When things begin to suck, and a trend inevitably stales, then you begin to loose that benefit. Like companies tightening art-budgets: all of a sudden things are a bit quieter for a while. Ok, ok, maybe I'm making a mountain out of a molehill.

I just think that perhaps it might be interesting to archive some of the ones you like, because the author/owner may not be counted on to keep the fire burning. Maybe we'll just move to a more cooperative content mode: Like Charlie's... A facility is made available to a community, and everyone tosses in two cents on whatever. I work with a unionized workforce, and I am perpetually amazed at how well-organized the informal support system works: stocking and selling sodas and coffe to keep funding the bottled-water deliveries.

The “flower fund” for someone getting the wrong end of the stick, various pools on athletic events. It's pretty interesting. Whereas my department has nothing so formal or organized. My department also probably has a 300% pay-disparity in 20 people. (The p/t new guy's maybe $30k, the boss is $100) And this a non-profit run by the state. It just seems so unlikely until you see it. So when it comes to communities producing, I've seen both ends. I think the hope lies my union co-workers. Form up with your peers, network, and as an aside, make some content. Home movies chopped together to garage-band music? Howsabout micro radio stations? Blogs? Whatever, it all works. We can no longer think of another idiotic bubble allowing rich technocrats to use their toys to generate content on the side. And the bored kiddies will mostly continue to produce attacks and exploits. Oh I'm rambling again. I should go take a nap, it is after all Sunday...


So the old Swedish bomb was dying. We loved it's sunroof (open in all weathers). We loved it's turning radius (advantages of a longitudinally mounted engine). We loved it's lack of front-overhang. We loved it's oddness. [Score “Excellant” if you can name the make/model/probable year after 2 hints. “Average” if after three. “Motorist” if you still haven't figured it out.] However, we did not love the notion of at least 1 drive-shaft and 1 caliper needing immediate replacement. In the latter days of a midwestern January, this was looking like serious money. I simply cannot warm my garage up enough to tackle the job, though I'd done both several times before. So I started to search in earnest. I came onto some interesting used cars. Within a week, I had been OUT of deals on a used Subaru Baja and something I've completely forgotten about. The Baja was interesting: Odd car, you should give it more consideration that you are right now. And if they enlarge that pass-through opening to real proportions (add 15-25%) this is not a car to be ignored. It's quite nice, and yes my offspring called it the “Retardo Mobile” but I could live with that. (Like in her 1st grade: I'd get most of the kids waiting outside of the school involved in an illegal game of tag, and when they tagged me, I'd loudly proclaimed that I liked being “it” and I wasn't going to tag anyone. Instant reversal of the game, and I was being chased by dozens of gradeschoolers!! The nuns & teachers hated me...) The owner of said Baja made a pronouncement after I drove 36 miles one-way in a 15 year old car with loudly protesting CV joints, that “it wasn't about the money.” His girlfriend hated the car. He was wealthy, had a job of minor prominence in hospitality, and he'd bought the car before the girlfriend, or without her realization of what a Baja is. It had to go. I got interested. I got financing. All was in place. He, however, needed to drive to my bank with title to sign some stuff and get paid $16k. Sure, it's a drive for him, and had we gotten that far, I was fully intent on driving him home. But we never got there: He was too busy managing his place of employ. I raged in my head. I mean, how badly run was this place that it would burn down with his 1-2 hour absence? I told him it was $16k for 2 hours of his time, and he pompously rebutted “it's not about the money.” He told me he'd be back from vacation in 4 days, and if I was still interested, we could resume. I thought but did not correct him: we could START OVER. My coworkers could not conceive of this guy's world-view. But I figured it out: He doesn't want to SELL the car. It's not about the money. He LOVES the car, he said so. But the girlfriend does not. And so, as long as the Baja is UP FOR SALE, they're both happy. Presto, instant peace with the piece. (Sorry, couldn't resist: He's rather older, and I just cannot help but imagine the “trophy girlfriend” in her pneumatic 20's. Reader's and lawyer's of the unnamed parties should note: There are no facts to back up this opinion, and the author is a sucker for the cheap line. Proof positive lies in the offspring's instantaneous creation of the derogative moniker for the car.) So now I'm in an odd position: I've actually turned down or failed at buying TWO used cars in as many weeks. I've had over 20 cars. I am to car-buying what Charlie Brown is to christmas-tree purchases. I can unfailingly survey a selection of 1000 cars, and unerringly pick the one with “the most potential.” My picks would all be excellent fodder for one of those reality TV shows on the Discovery Empire: take an odd but nice old car and expend hideous amounts of energy turning into something enviable. And I can SEE it in every one of these puppies I buy. Except one: After doing a most excellent engine rebuild (mussed up in the home stretch when the machinist failed to report grinding the crank 10 thousandths UNDER), I sold it. Now that guy was lucky, what a sweet deal he got. Oh, and when I crashed the 260z into a bridge abutment RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE BUYER. Yep, sweet. So, armed with this history, I'd dodged two potential bullets. I thought, ok, let's try a NEW car. After all, the bank thinks I'm a worthy risk for 16k on a BAJA!!! Ok, try to guess what I bought... Manual. I love hatchbacks, wagon's too much empty-weight, trunk's too limited. Pick on my old car, but it was pretty damn sporty for its class in its time. Ready? No, not the Mini. Very nice car, very VERY well built/designed. And the full-roof sunroof was terribly hard to resist. But, it's not a great car to live in. In fact, this car's gotta get awards for hype-over-function. True, the Neu Beetle is totally stupid: there is so little non-passenger useable volume in that car it's insulting. The Mini's just got enough stupid features masquerading as “cool” that it's wrong. I test drove one with the better tires on a COLD winter day. And when I went across the street to see what packed snow was like, I almost got killed. I came out from behind a building HEAD ON with a newish Cadillac. He stopped DEAD, right there. I stomped the brakes, and the ABS went to work at full duty-cycle, and I majestically slid inexorably to within 5 feet of hitting him. After that, I looked at the price and the rotten financing, and thought “Leave it for the young(er) and foolish.” So you y&f's out there: Look at the mini before the beetle. Unless you're smart, then the diesel Beetle's the way to go. So, still guessing? It's an American car. Only the 4th one I've ever owned. (82 Ford cop car, 76 Malibu, 82 Cutlass Ciera wagon) Manual, hatchback, sporty. Forget the Chevy Malibu: I wanted the 5-door, but manual? There isn't even an option. It's a Ford Focus. And I paid at least an extra $6k for the SVT. And there's nothing you're gonna say to dent my dream. Consumer's Reports said the Malibu and the Focus are both “Toyota-level quality and reliability.” And look at their reader's statistics: '01 and newer, all full red circles, just like the Camry. Bang Zoom, they finally figured it out. Sure, the SVT burns premium. And it gets WAAY lower gas mileage if you're an idiot. But if you open the roof, put in tunes you enjoy, let your head rest on the headrest, and just be mellow, it does ok. And man is it a nice ride. Like you can't believe the comparison. When I get to work, I have to swipe my ID to get into the lot. The old car, I'd start opening the window at least a block early to make sure it would make it down, and so I could make repairs if needed. Now? Push to the second detent and whoosh. Oh, and the sunroof? Auto open/close: push and it's done. I'm slowly unlearning my survival-dress-code, and I hope by next winter I'll be wearing loafers in the winter. (“Dress to walk,” I used to tell and we've had to do that more than once...) Ooh, this summer, I'm going to wear LONG SLEEVES on a hot day, just to see what A/C's like. Don't worry, I'll go back to wearing shorts and sandals for the drive to save gas. What a frickin' change this means. You cannot imagine it if you haven't carried tools on your belt for the last 10 years “just in case.” Or if you don't know the wiring of your car better than your mechanic. (He replaced the fuel-injection computer twice. I figured out that the socket for the power-lead to the relay had broken it's retainers and slid down.) If you don't know what anti-seize compound is or why it should be on EVERY bolt in your suspension. Or why silicone-glue caps should be put on every bolt-end exposed in the undercarriage. Or what Cramolin or Deoxit is (Same thing, new name) Or how to figure out grounding-failures: only OLD cars start developing oxide-induced ground faults. Heck, I might even stop carrying my Swiss Army knife... uh, wait a second... An Addendum, 60,000 miles later: Still a good car, folks. Some things I’ve learned. Forget premium: Car Talk says there’s no car on the American Market that REQUIRES it. Considering the difference is (RON) 87 to 92 is +5%, I think they’re right. 30k miles hasn’t had a problem, and with considerable savings. Second obvious fact: Thank god for warranties. Throw-out bearing failed. Shortly thereafter, right ball joint: Coincidence? I think not. To compliment this last repair, they f’d up the strut bearing. My peak more-than-one-tank mileage is about 40% higher than Ford’s 26mpg estimate. I, for one, think this is remarkable. But time and (over)enthusiasm for getting there has made the factory estimate more common. My significant repairs to this car have been...none. Replacing broken parts (mirrors, tail light) but nothing that I’d say is bad. Of course, I got whacked $1k for brakes, which I think was dealer bullshit, but I fell for it. My own fault, though stopping—and it does stop—is kind of nice. Mods I’d like to make: Use the 2-DIN slot for a stereo with Aux inputs, and decent Navi. The $1800 Pioneer looks ideal, but...ow. Shifter with reverse-lockout: a 14lb spring does not count. Alarm: why is this extra? DRLs: with the Xenons, this may be difficult. 3-light tail lights. The “wiper goes on with reverse” trick in the Euro models. Thoughts on the NEXT car: I’m tired of bending over to enter and unfolding to exit my transport. I have seen the light my friends, and an SUV lies before me. So few diesels to choose from that are not stupid beyond words.* The MB “M” with the blue tec diesel looks marvy but if I have that money, call the cops ‘cause I’m sure not bein’ paid that legally. The SportTrac is a very spiffy alternative (see “Baja” above, only real-sized) but no diesel. F-that: I think I can expect no worse MPGs from my SUV on kerosene than I get from the SVT on regular. Wonder if there’s a Canadian market SportTrac with a diesel...?


My apologies for the copyrighted alternative spelling for a time-honored Anglo Saxon (or is it Dutch?) monosyllable. Just don't want the 2nd titles to offend. (Starts with “f”...ends in “ck” and it’s NOT “firetruck.”) Ok, so I never thought of it that way: magazine-content is no limited to the size of the periodical. Interesting. I wonder what the cost-benefit curve is to adding one more sheet to a run. Oh, let's see now, if we had to lose a little of the interview to prevent us adding a sheet...? Ok, that's pretty small potato(e)s compared to Uncle Charlie's regulations of one-hour programming. And certainly cable, being unregulated in this, allows heinous examples of ridiculosity. (TBS movies are just amazing. The last 1/3rd of the movie is uninterrupted commercials.) Originally, time-compression was to get more movie in the slot, now it's to get more commercial-time in the (arbitrary) slot. Odd especially since the “cable” channels are totally willing to run weird end times, unlike the b'cast folks who must end at :00 or die. I'm really a poster child for BTW's excellent points as I channel-surf exclusively now. I never watch more than a minute of anything, I don't watch the shows, I watch the juxtaposition of them. Damn, I wish I had 125 monitors + PVRs, then like a giant Avid, I'd compile a tape of the weird adjacencies. I think it would be fun to try to make up some famous tract in nothing but word by word snippets from the boob-tube. “The Gettysburg Address” comes to mind too easily. Maybe something from Chaucer or the Ilyiad? Something as far from 21st C. boob-tube as you can get. What a project: like the guy with the website that speaks arbitrary text with snippets from popular music.


Note Added 2007: My friend’s website was called “ChickenPig” for an imaginary restaurant of this name. (“Right around the corner from everywhere.”) The proprietor—Charlie—was a subject of fictional account, here’s one of my submissions.

The ChickenPig's weird in many ways, young Skywalker. But Charlie brings them all in: there have been professionals of all stripes in here at one time or the other (can you tell I'm making a project out of this place?) but its always the peaceable kingdom. Kind of a truce. Heck, I got chewed out for bringing work in here once. A day of herding cats, trying to get a room full of marketeers' computers working, and I was tired of doorknobs. Came in for a diet-something-or-other, and in two seconds, I found Charlie's very large fist attached to my shirt. Mysteriously, my face was now millimeters from his, though I couldn't recall leaning in. I received a quiet, deadly-serious, and unclative admonition about not bringing the day's evils in this place. Punctuated by a wink, I fell back onto my stool and was too stunned to splutter.

The room—I wrongly thought was empty—erupted into applause and welcoming cheers. I guess everyone had enjoyed that lecture at some time or another, and it was the house policy to welcome the newly indoctrinated. I enjoyed many rounds of fizzy caffeine from all attending, and listened (for once) to everyone's relating their “first time” being told to preserve the ChickenPig's amicable atmosphere.

Funny, no one ever needed a repeat performance. And now I've added my voice and round a couple of times, tonight just a while ago. I heard that collective pause in conversation, saw a rather young legal-type getting The Lecture. Couldn't overhear a word of it, no one ever does. But when she flopped back into reality, lovely dress shirt rumpled permanently, we welcomed her to the family, and she had the right reaction: stunned-sheep followed by relief of almost comical proportions. The confessions proceeded, she seemed to absorb each one as the treasure it was offered. Hope the new indoctrinee figures out the weird part: no one has EVER said a word prior to receiving The Lecture. Just Charlie's mojo.


categories:

  • “cartoons” tags:
  • “toons”

I've never really thought that the yout' had left me behind until 10 minutes ago. Co-viewing the Cartoon Network, I've finally seen a product that simply made no sense to me. Now look, I waited out “Sponge Bob” and liked it. I at least gave “Cat Dog” enough time for the concept to pretty much live down to its concept. “Samurai Jack,” yeah, just like all of Genndy's work it's got a great idea, some good writing, good art, and nothing he does knows when to end. (That covers “Power Puff Girls” &  ”Dexter's Laboratory”) I dig “Courage,the Cowardly Dog” but not too much at one sitting. I loved “The Tick” premier, despised the rest. “South Park”? ugh.

My problem now is “Evil Con Carne.” I just went to the web site to get this explanation, which might've helped...Nah: “Hector Con Carne wants to take over the world. Problem is, his brain and stomach are all that's left of him. Through the wonder of mad science, the two remaining organs have been transplanted into Boskov, a less-than-bright circus bear who unwillingly serves as Hector's only mechanism for seeking his diabolical revenge.” Ok, what do you think? The episode in question, the stomach gets sick. The brain wants to take over the world, and the female character says they (bear + brain) can go out and take over the world, but the stomach has to stay in bed. Ok, so plot goes along to denouement, when brain says he cannot do the critical evil act because he doesn't have the stomach for it. Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong way to go for a joke. Good joke, but whoa.

Now I relish a good non sequitur like the next person. But a circus bear? And I mean the device doesn't have the bear talking, oh no, bears can't talk. The brain talks for itself. Then if we're gonna let that happen, the stomach can talk for itself too.

And it appears to be a period-piece, or else the creators are stretching some point to express their steam-punk-ness. (Paddle-wheeler, and hot-air balloon are the modes of transit featured. Though, of course, the plan is formulated as the result of a TV news report...) Somebody needs to remind the fill-and-color guys that hot air balloon envelopes don't rotate, and that continuity errors are just that.

Ok, so now I've committed the SNL sin and gone on too long on the setup. Sorry, I'll re-edit it. What are these dingbats thinking? Will their audience swallow anything? Wait, they probably think Samruai Jack is profiting off the manga craze? Like “Wicked” is from “The Wizard of Oz”? I guess when you can't make an elegant premise, you make an extreme one. Wonder when we'll get back to valuing the simply fantastic.


categories:

  • “art”

Author's Note: This entry predates the excellent movie starring Scarlett Johansson.

12 Dec 2003

Uh, wow. Using Charlie's link to web around, I checked www.fimoculus.com, which linked me to an in-depth site on Vermeer's painting “Girl With a Pearl Earring.” Holy mackeral. I spent 18 years as a projectionist in a previous life, and for a while entertained illusions of participating in the great content-engine of the moving picture. So I got fascinated with light. I can still, lo these many years since, make a decent guess at color-temp and f-stop. I have a near-teen who knows what “magic hour” is and can tell you when it's happening.

The point is, I've never seen this work until tonight, and had no friggin' idea that some guy was doing what every phtog, cinematog, and image-hacker is still trying to reach. Only this here Dutch guy did it in the 17th century. You've got to find an online image of this painting. I mean for god's sake, there are EYE LIGHTS in this painting. I mean pointilist-sized eyelights. And they're absolutely RIGHT in that entirely WRONG way. That is, like the airbrushers at Playboy, they're exaggerated only just enough that they READ. The pose, the look, the parted lips.

I like art in that distant way that says, wow, cool, what's next. But this is staggering, this is four HUNDRED years old, and it could be passed off as the cover shot for some mag. Seriously, let's get a casting call out there, I'll bet we can get a model that's PERFECT. Restage the shot. Shoot it all nice and digital. Then put it on whatever. Plaster the cover with teases for the stories inside, and no one at the grocery store would even think it's werid. Heck, redo this experiment using precisely a print of the painting. The only diffs would be the black background (covered with type though in this trial) and the ever so slight unsharpness granted by the brush strokes.

God that would be a great experiment, just to make a couple of dozen copies, put them at the check out, fake the entire mag. Greek all the interior, with fake ads, fake content. Then video how many people pick it up to thumb through. What a painting. I guess now I'll have to go see the original. Wish I'd known about that when I was in the Netherlands back then... Oh well, a plan for the soon-to-be-teen. Or “then-teen” since it'll be a while. I'll post some more art links soon, there's an abstract bust I like.

Fear no art.


categories:

  • “networks” tags:
  • “wep”
  • “wifi”
  • “wpa”

I'm a wired network guy. The mere existence of cabling employs a large cadre of specialists, all so I can bounce around with my laptop, handheld or OptiView and set up a new network every 10 days or so. This description totally belies the mundanity of the job, but I'll let the “dot com bubble”-ness of it persist for whimsical nostalgia. Like cold-war ethics. Or Bauhaus-modern. They all warm me in an odd way.

Sorry, back to the notion. Networks employ me, wires employ my buds. And I've been pretty eloquent about WiFi until now: I wouldn't base my continued employment on WiFi even if all the cat-5 turned to Ramen noodles. Wireless leaks. Wireless sucks. All hype and no cattle. Rubber doth not the road meet. Until WPA. I know, some Albanian teenager's just 2 days from showing an exploit for the most common WPA implementation, but let me enjoy the time that it works.

WiFi Protected Access (WPA) is a suite of practices, some old, some new, that will do all that Wireless has needed. Sure, LEAP's cute: allows a username and password to get on the net. (Authentication.) And WEP's kind of cool, it encrypts the packets in a kind of lame way for privacy. But WEP doesn't really authenticate. And LEAP's got no encryption to it. But WPA's got both. And better. Once authenticated, an encryption key's agreed upon and it's CHANGED randomly. FREQUENTLY.

See, WEP's not so good at encryption cuz it's weak. Give me enough packets, and I can figure out the encryption key. And “enough packets” turns out to be only a very few minutes' on a busy network. But even WEP is good if you can change the key every few SECONDS. And so to WPA. We agree you are you, and you're allowed into the club. We even have a way to agree on what secret language we'll use when in the club AND how to change those secret languages in the middle of the convos!! There's even a guy named MIC who looks at every packet and sees if the keys at both ends fit. If not, it might be a lame attempt of a 3rd party to shoe horn into the convo, and MIC shuts the conversation down for some period of time.

Since all the pieces of WPA already exist, it will work on most equipment. Not all, as I found out with my AirPort card, but most. The load on the card's a bit higher now, what with all the encryption. (Not just the packets moving, but encryption of stuff between the base-station and the card. The LEAP and MIC stuff for example.) So I'm going to work this week to start splainin' to the wiring guys that we have to either embrace change or get rolled over by it.

We ain't stopping this steam-roller, we just have to figure out how to ride it or run from it. (Farming's kind of a nice profession...) Can't think of the last time the world moved so fast. (V90? Nah, but it was cool for a while there. Saw the FIRST demo at Comdex95) Now we need 802.1x to get here. RIGHT AWAY...


categories:

  • “life” tags:
  • “eloquence”
  • “succinctness”
  • “thoughtful”

In a convo about optical efficiency, I asked my boss what the f-stop on his glasses would be. I implied that I thought they'd be near-zero loss. He immediately and succinctly asked me if there were reflections on the outside, and in one second I figured out that they are indeed lossy. Light bounced back is not passed through. Loss.

Of course, as I sit to write this, freshly poured diet something-or-other (thanks Charlie), I cannot recall all of the other times I've heard these eloquent summaries of scientific thought. Fortune-cookie slips that sum up universal truths. The number of times I've asked or been asked “What's the route?” when a computer refuses to talk to its friends has to qualify in this. It's the kick in the head that points out the obvious. And we all need that sometimes.

Oh, I remember one. Spouting a hypothesis by an SF author I was reading at the time, I quoted the absence of any formula tying past to present, present to future. My then-boss (hmm...no pattern there, really) immediately spouted “F=MA” and he was right: causality exemplified. Ruined that author's premise too, because without linked causality, his time-tripping story “solved” some of the contradictions of that sub-genre.

I'm trying to remember any of the 11,000,000 such quick-minded phrases Mr. Meyers taught me in my youth. Mr. Meyers was a friend of my parents, a retired engineer from Univac, he spent some time in WWII working on depth-charges. This man was an Engineer, friends. A real, degreed, dyed-in-the-wool, slide-rule toting engineer. In the Apollo era, this guy fit right in. He played with computers when they made the Oracle of Delphi look like a public library.

Mr. Meyers taught me to mow left around obstacles, because you can get in tighter on the side opposite the discharge chute. He started me on taking things apart. Which lead to my learning to put them back together. I learned about metal-fatigue, stress-limits, how to not cut yourself when using sharp tools, and a whole life's outlook towards machines, tech, and how “broken” really is just a temporary state of affairs.

Think back to your favorite science teacher, was there one phrase or line that she repeated? Other than “wake up.” Or a math teacher that hit something so golden and proper in one sentence that to this day you still feel the resonance? Think slowly, there has to be one. Now go find a kid, and teach it to them.


categories:

  • “cars” tags:
  • “donks”
  • “hoons”
  • “jalops”
  • “scientist-phrasing”

Being the car-hacker type, I was eager to eavesdrop on these guys here at the bar. Earnest youthful types, I figured them to be good for a laugh. I was mistaken, though it took a long time to leave the usual Male Car Convo for stochiometry.

Yep, these guys were car tweakers with brains. As I'm just a one-book expert on handling-mods, I still entwined myself into their convo with relish and, for once in my life, more ears than mouth. We had a damned good time, and learned/taught a lot.

I'm becoming a real fan of Xenocrates, he sat on my shoulder throughout this and kept muzzling me when I wanted to join in: these guys were out of my league in much of what goes on when the air-fuel mixture goes BANG.

I was able to keep things grounded in matters practical to keeping the power on the road and the car over the contact patches. At one point, I was quite surprised when one spouted an aphorism I'd heard a reality-TV celeb mutter in a recent episode. (Hey, when it comes to hacking, there's only a few places to get your media fill.) I asked about this: so you put huge wheels and lo-profile tires on your Escalade and now you need up-rated brakes. Huh? Where's the change in mass*speed that obviates this choice? We agreed, after some envelope-scratching, that as a practical matter, the choice for those boss new Brembos would be looks, not necessity.

Course, there wasn't an SUV owner for miles in this convo, still we all saw the same show and enjoyed the usual chuckle mixed with admiration for the license to chop.

The thread returned to the stratosphere and I understood only every other concept, but that's how I learn best. Sit at the feet of my betters and listen. Then go puzzle it out on my own. (The internet helps a lot there.)

I love being talked over. I relish the chance to listen to those whose thinking is just slightly out of my reach. Besides, I find my analog way of thinking provides surprising inputs, as long as I keep my mouth on a short leash.

Flashback time: my high school planned a field trip to a little college named for a Swedish saint that hosts an annual conference of Nobel Laureates. As a solidly C student in what we'd be told was the worst class in the school's history, I wasn't really maybe the first choice for attendance. But I was on the bus. The point? Listening to Murray Gell-Mann talk about sub-atomic particles. My eyes were crossed with the effort to understand what I could and remember what I couldn't. And in the end, I came out without clearly integrating flavor, color, spin and the relationship between the pitiful numbers of quarks we understood then and the atomic particles we all knew and loved.

So at one point in the Chicken Pig, I was smiling with a distant stare, thinking of that lecture and the same feeling of running to catch up. Only here I was trying to hang onto details of thermal gradients that were going to get me home. Funny, I never personalized those quarks, they seemed to get lost like the weak forces in the bosonic scaling.

Well, I now have a huge number of things to look up and grasp. And I feel well acquitted in my minor contributions. They were of the type that succinctly reminded the audience of what—at that instant—mattered. Scientist Phrasing, I call it. But that's a subject for a whole 'nother blog...

You meet the most unusual people in this place. If two angels were enjoying a liquid respite after a week of being good, listening Mark Knopfler's filling the air with notes unimagined, I wouldn't be surprised at all. (With thanks to Douglas Adams for that verbal image.)


categories:

  • “computers”
  • “networks”

I installed my nifty-neue “Panther” on my Apple. And lo-and-behold, nslookup's been deprecated, now it's dig and host.

I am all for kernel revisions. If I were still in Wintel-land, I'd be downloading every friggin' update to KDE and *BSD or Linux that I could get my hands on. My OS would be in such turmoil, it'd be a wonder if I ever got anything done.

But Og fear change. And how that primordial fear comes out when, after ridiculous upheaval, you suddenly notice one small thing's been adjusted. The tornado takes your house, and you're wondering where Fluffy's bowl is.

When I was a kid, my parents picked up the whole bunch, and moved overseas. For a while there, we moved almost monthly. Move #1 was enough, after that, it was almost “business as usual.”

I don't recall having this fear of change then, in fact I don't even think I noticed it was change. My wife's face fell when I told her about my childhood, I was surprised at her reaction: Whaddiya mean, didn't EVERYONE do this in their youth?

Once heard a therapist say “What's normal?” and now I think normal is what you take in stride. All the rest is unusual.

So it is with nslookup: if I'd been forced to transition to dig or host earlier, I would've never cared. But as it is, now I'm all rattled. Wonder what the next surprise will hold.

So I'll stop ranting now, and you can chuckle bemusedly at my infantile newbieness. You were using dig back when you still needed a keyboard. Your pony tail's grown a meter, covering you input-jack.

Ow. That “matrix” spike tickles mt sinuses.